Commentaries

Northern Lights Community Charitable Gaming Association

NLCCGA Workshop Evaluations on the 2024 Community Gaming Grant Guidelines from the Dawson Creek Workshop on April 20/24 and the Fort St. John Workshop on May 11/24.

Analysis done by R. Le Gear – 6 out 10 evaluation sheets received from the Dawson Creek Workshop and 7 out 10 evaluation sheets received from the Fort St. John Workshop.

DC refers to Dawson Creek Workshop and FSJ refers to the Fort St. John Workshop

Evaluation Form

What parts of the workshop did you find beneficial for you and your organization?

  1. All Sections were good (5) (DC)
  2. Updates on the process & good examples (1) (DC)
  3. All sections were informative & beneficial (2) (FSJ)
  4. Second half was the most informative (1) (FSJ)
  5. Learning about the benefit of Volunteer hours and learning about internal & external restricted funds. (1) (FSJ)
  6. Clarified what the Gaming Grant is and the application process (1) (FSJ)
  7. Understanding what paperwork was needed and what records to keep (1) (FSJ)
  8. Capital Project Grants; tips for early application; and the allocation of expenses. (1) (FSJ)

What parts of the workshop could be omitted?

  1. None (6) (DC)
  2. None (7) (FSJ)

What parts of the workshop could have more emphasis, more details or more time?

  1. None (6) (DC)
  2. None (5) (FSJ)
  3. Workshop was well balanced. (1) (FSJ)
  4. Workshop was just an overview, but the NLCCGA is very supportive (1) (FJS)
  5. How to do the applications in detail. (1) (FSJ)

Suggestions for the improvement of the workshop.

  1. None (5) (DC)
  2. Need a copy of blank application form (1) ((DC)
  3. None (6) (FSJ)
  4. Need a lot more time (1) (FSJ)

Method of Delivery 

Excellent (6) DC; (6) (FSJ).    Good (0) (DC); (1) (FSJ).     Satisfactory (0) (DC) (FSJ).                Fine (0) (DC) (FSJ).                Poor (0) (DC) (FSJ)

Suggestions for Improvement of the delivery of the presentation

  1. None (6) (DC)
  2. None (7) (FSJ)

Rate Workshop – Overall satisfaction.

Excellent (6) (DC); (7) (FSJ).       Good (0) (DC) (FJS).          Satisfactory (0) (DC) (FSJ).            Fine (0) (DC) (FSJ).                     Poor (0) (DC) (FSJ).

Heard about the Workshop via the following:

NLCCGA Member (4) (DC); (3) (FSJ).     Facebook (1) (DC); (2) (FSJ).      Other (1) DC); (2) FSJ)